Starship Titanic To your Steam
3 December 2023
Kroon Oranje Casino https://vogueplay.com/nl/space-wars/ Derving Timer Casino Login
4 December 2023

After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures across Europe, fresh technologies have become reviving these kinds of systems. Via lie recognition tools tested at the line to a system for confirming documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of solutions is being included in asylum applications. This article explores just how these technology have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. This reveals just how asylum seekers are transformed into pressured hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with unpredictable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their capacity to work these systems and to follow their right for coverage.

It also demonstrates how these technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering these people from being able to access the programs of coverage. It www.ascella-llc.com/generated-post-2 further argues that examines of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms for these technologies, by which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects exactly who are self-disciplined by their reliability on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article argues that these systems have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double result: while they aid to expedite the asylum process, they also generate it difficult just for refugees to navigate these systems. They can be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to bogus decisions made by non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, they will pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.

Comments are closed.

English